The Mission gives the typical Hollywood
version of history. The longing to describe an event of the past by searching
to make a hero out of a group of people who would not have been viewed as such
at that time tends to be a recurring theme in historical representations
produced by Hollywood. When watching The
Mission one must remember that maximizing entertainment is the goal of Hollywood
to produce large profits. Historical accuracy is usually near the bottom of the
list for movie producers.
The
films appears to do a good job at representing the tensions over religion and
other controversial issues such as slavery, but it’s representation of the
Jesuit mission and Guarani people appear to be lacking in factual substance.
James Saeger’s article gives a rather compelling argument that the Jesuit
mission and the Guarani people were actually very different than portrayed in
the film. The film portrays the relationship between the two groups as a
friendly and compassionate relationship. The Guarani are rather accepting of
the Christian faith, and seem to only question the Pope’s ability to know the
will of God. Saeger explains that the Guarani people were not as accepting of
the Christian faith as the movie may lead one to believe. They were highly
superstitious and stuck to many of their traditions. The Jesuit missionaries
are portrayed as heroes in the film that are only concerned with the well being
of the Guarani people. In truth, they were there under the orders of the
Catholic Church. They had a job to make land transfers more peaceful and
religious leaders hoped Christianity would make the Indian people of South
America submissive to these land transfers. One thing the movie does correctly
portray is the strong will of the Guarani people.
The
Guarani people were not so willing to just give up their way of life. The films
portrays that they were easily persuaded by the Jesuits, but Saeger argues that
most of the relationship relied on the mass influx of iron that was used to
produce tools and weapons that improved the overall living condition of the Guarani people.
Within the film, the Guarani people are portrayed more as savages who
drastically needed the help of the Jesuits. In truth, the Guarani people were
more than capable of surviving on their own. The tools and weapons initially
brought to them was simply an attempt along with Christianity in order to make
them more submissive to the European powers. Their strong will to maintain
their own way of life did not allow this to happen.
The European powers of the sixteenth century
were interested in the land only for its economical advantages, this included
being able to enslave the natives of the land to use them as a means of cheap
labor for producing goods. Surely many of the missionaries were there because
they truly believed they were brining people to God, but they were also pawns
of the European powers and the Church to colonize new lands. These facts are
not clearly stated within the film itself. Without delving into the true
accounts of the Guarani people and the turmoil they faced, many people would
miss the obvious historical inaccuracies of The
Mission.
I would have to agree with many of the points you made. Being so much inferior to the European powers technologically, the Guarani and other South American natives never stood much of a chance. One aspect of the film that can be appreciated is the portrayel of the Europeans seeing the natives as more of a commodity than as actual people. It is hard to imagine being at the expense of foreign invaders that really could care less about the well being of your culture as well as the quality of life. This is a sad chapter in human history ; one that should not be forgotten,
ReplyDelete